{"id":7426,"date":"2021-05-19T10:21:37","date_gmt":"2021-05-19T09:21:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/icoprevencio.cat\/uct\/?page_id=7426\/"},"modified":"2025-05-29T14:39:33","modified_gmt":"2025-05-29T13:39:33","slug":"2021-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/icoprevencio.cat\/uct\/es\/2021-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2021"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

Publicacions<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/a>
\r\n

2021<\/h3>

Amalia B, Fu M, Tigova O, Ballb\u00e8 M, Castellano Y, Semple S, Clancy L, Vardavas C, L\u00f3pez MJ, Cort\u00e9s N, P\u00e9rez-Ortu\u00f1o R, Pascual JA, Fern\u00e1ndez E. <\/p>

Environmental and individual exposure to secondhand aerosol of electronic cigarettes in confined spaces: Results from the TackSHS Project<\/a>. Art\u00edculo<\/span> <\/p>

Indoor Air. <\/span>2021<\/span>;31<\/span>:1601\u20131613<\/span>.<\/p>

Resumen<\/a><\/span> | Enlaces<\/a><\/span> | BibTeX<\/a><\/span> | Etiquetas: <\/span><\/p>

@article{pmid33905602,
\r\ntitle = {Environmental and individual exposure to secondhand aerosol of electronic cigarettes in confined spaces: Results from the TackSHS Project},
\r\nauthor = {Amalia B and Fu M and Tigova O and Ballb\u00e8 M and Castellano Y and Semple S and Clancy L and Vardavas C and L\u00f3pez MJ and Cort\u00e9s N and P\u00e9rez-Ortu\u00f1o R and Pascual JA and Fern\u00e1ndez E},
\r\ndoi = {10.1111\/ina.12841},
\r\nissn = {1600-0668},
\r\nyear  = {2021},
\r\ndate = {2021-09-01},
\r\njournal = {Indoor Air},
\r\nvolume = {31},
\r\nnumber = {5},
\r\npages = {1601--1613},
\r\nabstract = {Secondhand electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) aerosol (SHA) might impair indoor air quality and expose bystanders. This study aims to investigate exposure to SHA in controlled conditions of enclosed settings simulating real-world scenario. An experiment was performed in a car and in a room, in which SHA was generated during a 30-minute ad libitum use of an e-cigarette. The experiment was replicated on five consecutive days in each setting. We measured PM , airborne nicotine concentrations, and biomarkers of exposure to SHA, such as nicotine metabolites, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, propylene glycol, and glycerol in bystanders' saliva samples before, during, and after the exposure period. Self-reported health symptoms related to exposure to SHA were also recorded. The results showed that the highest median PM concentration was recorded during the exposure period, being 21\u00a0\u00b5g\/m in the room setting and 16\u00a0\u00b5g\/m in the car setting-about twofold increase compared to the baseline. Most concentrations of the airborne nicotine and all biomarkers were below the limit of quantification in both settings. Bystanders in both settings experienced some short-term irritation symptoms, expressed as dry throat, nose, eyes, and phlegm. In conclusion, short-term use of an e-cigarette in confined spaces increased indoor PM level and caused some irritation symptoms in bystanders.},
\r\nkeywords = {},
\r\npubstate = {published},
\r\ntppubtype = {article}
\r\n}
\r\n<\/pre><\/div>
Cerrar<\/a><\/p><\/div>
Secondhand electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) aerosol (SHA) might impair indoor air quality and expose bystanders. This study aims to investigate exposure to SHA in controlled conditions of enclosed settings simulating real-world scenario. An experiment was performed in a car and in a room, in which SHA was generated during a 30-minute ad libitum use of an e-cigarette. The experiment was replicated on five consecutive days in each setting. We measured PM , airborne nicotine concentrations, and biomarkers of exposure to SHA, such as nicotine metabolites, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, propylene glycol, and glycerol in bystanders' saliva samples before, during, and after the exposure period. Self-reported health symptoms related to exposure to SHA were also recorded. The results showed that the highest median PM concentration was recorded during the exposure period, being 21\u00a0\u00b5g\/m in the room setting and 16\u00a0\u00b5g\/m in the car setting-about twofold increase compared to the baseline. Most concentrations of the airborne nicotine and all biomarkers were below the limit of quantification in both settings. Bystanders in both settings experienced some short-term irritation symptoms, expressed as dry throat, nose, eyes, and phlegm. In conclusion, short-term use of an e-cigarette in confined spaces increased indoor PM level and caused some irritation symptoms in bystanders.<\/div>
Cerrar<\/a><\/p><\/div>